RE: Static portable build for OSX?
"Kevin Gale" <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:31:40 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.image-magick.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Sam. A couple of years ago I created a guide for doing this which was available somewhere on the ImageMagick site. I've just had a quick look but cannot find it but someone else might know where it is. Regards, Kevin. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] on behalf of Samuel Monsarrat Sent: Tue 19/02/2008 3:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [magick-developers] Static portable build for OSX? Hi, We use Imagemagick in our application suite (http://scenari-platform.org). Our applications are available for Linux, Windows and MacOSX, For these last two we need to bundle ImageMagick with our apps as no dependence system exists. In the case of MacOSX this means that we need to build a static and portable build of ImageMagick (we only need convert), and try as I might, I simply have had no success. I always end up with huge binaries (that are meant to be static so that is OK) that still seem to be linked dynamically to the various delegates. Has someone got a success story on building ImageMagick under MacOSX that produces static and portable (need to be bundled in a Mac app)? Sam. ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________