Re: debayer implementation.
"Alexandre Poltorak" <[email protected]> Wed, 7 May 2008 19:35:19 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.image-magick.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It can be useful for others but probably with some modifications. With the HDR stuff it is useful "only" for us because it is really sensor related. What we are looking to do is to have a way to convert a RAW image or JP4 (JP4 is based on JPEG compression of the raw Bayer pixels, rearranged in each macroblock before compression to reduce the high frequency components caused by color) to an HDR TIFF or EXR file. So as i understand the filter is the best way. Thanks. 2008/5/7 <[email protected]>: > > e modified it slightly to match our images format and we are working now > on > > If you anticipate the algorithm is not general (can it work on any image, > will it only be useful to just a few ImageMagick users) it would probably > be best to implement it as an image filter. Otherwise if it is best to > implement on the command line, we still need a description of the the > algorithm parameters to ensure the current ImageMagick command line parser > can readily handle your option requirements. >