Re: jpg quality question with imagemagick and Gimp

On 13/09/2010 23:08, Bob Meetin wrote:
> It is many times 
> faster to use IM to run a series of comparative tests of, say, 30%, 40%, 
> 50% ... 100% quality if you wanted to do that.  Different programs - 
> different needs - different purposes.

Thank you Bob and Fred for your replies. I am doing some test using
several combinations of -quality -strip -depth.

IM is fast on the cli and that's the reason I want to use it.

The biggest size factor seems -quality, so far.

blau