Re: Conversion JPG --> PDF (was :Memory Increase)
Wolfgang Hugemann <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:29:05 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.image-magick.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> The difference in size is only very slight, about 1%, and it is not due >> to excessive data being stripped off. The image content is actually >> slightly different. I compared the two images via >> >> convert original.jpg extracted.jpg -compose difference -composite >> comparison.png >> >> and then counted the colours. > > A difference in color count does indicate a difference in image content > (although the same color count would not prove identical image > content). You misunderstood me: I counted the colours in comparison.png, which is 1 if the two images are identical. (This is the result I get when I combine the JPEGs with Acrobat and then extract them with pdfimages.) > Not only is there no benefit to the re-encoding, there are actually two > problems that result: it takes more processor power, and every > re-encoding loses a bit of quality. Well, that's why I'm asking all this ;-) Greetings from Münster, germany Wolfgang Hugemann