He said that SCO has not identified such.

What is your business address?

Whatever the limits of that immunity, it is clear that Lycos's
activities in this case fall squarely within those that Congress
intended to immunize.

Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd. No problem, we'll just call my
house.

For two of these items, and, again, this is undisputed, for two of these
items, Your Honor, 188 and 187, the technology which SCO alleges was
misused didn't even exist in DYNIX.

Groklaw - SCO's financial results are inWhen you want to know morebut
don't know where to look. Note also that the Linguistic Society of
America has posted its letter to ANSI, in which it explains
deficiencies it sees in OOXML. com is also given a link to the
corresponding message board on Raging Bull. After remaining bugs are
fixed, the general public release is scheduled for March 27.

Furthermore, IBM argued that SCO brought this claim in an untimely
manner.

THE WITNESS: It was not written by me. " In particular, UCS identified
postings made under eight different screen names as objectionable.

Again, the problem is Groklaw.

Chris has, as usual, done an outstanding job, and we thank you.
Iacobucci has served on SCO's Compensation Committee and Litigation
Oversight Committee.