Re: Re: Linux video editing patents
Daniel James <daniel-ljUBoSVpJTpWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:49:33 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.linux.movies |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Bob, > The good news is that 99.5% of the work involved with production and > post-production does not require patented compression algorithms. Right - If it wasn't for the split between raw production and compressed distribution formats, a Linux distribution like 64 Studio would be unviable. Unfortunately formats like MP3 are a de-facto standard for music on the web, so people like to have out of the box support in a distribution. We don't want to have to tell people 'after installation, Google for the location of this bit of source code and build your own binary' - it's just not practical for a lot of users. > Take note that GPL only covers *binary* distributions of software. GPL > software in source form may always be copied, compiled, and used for any > purpose. There are no restrictions on compiled software until the > binaries are distributed. Sure, but the patent lawyers don't care about the GPL, they just want the money. So we're doing our best to try to please everybody :-) > So if the compilation is done as part of the > install process then GPL restrictions are not involved. Also true, but we want the distribution to install in 20 minutes with few questions asked, rather than 20 hours, hence we based it on Debian packages pre-built for x86_64 processors rather than Gentoo source packages. Cheers! Daniel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click