Re: Website Status
mf <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:50:45 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.mcf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
ChristianHJW wrote: > 1. Our most important developer creates the complete website alone, > including specs pages ( not recommended ) > > 2. We go online now with mf's site and mf tries to copy and paste Lasse's > old pages into the php script, thus maintaining design > > 3. We go online now with mf's site and link to Lasse's old technical pages > until Steve is ready with the DocBook thing and the new specs, and then > generate the specs pages from DocBook in HTML or XHTML > > 4. We wait with the launch of mf's new site until Steve has finalized the > new specs and can generate the specs pages in XHTML in a similar design like > mf's php script > I personally vote for 3. I'd go for 3 if the DocBook pages can be fitted in the php frame we have now (maybe with a bit of alteration to the php script). ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en