Re: News from Corecodec team

ChristianHJW wrote:
> Damn Steve, could you please try not to copy the whole message in your reply
> but only the important parts of it you are referring to ?? lol ... ;-)

Sorry, I forgot to attach you .gif immage :)

>>Well, the CVS could be uploaded to CoreCodec, that's technically
>>possible. But first we need to know if the traffic won't be too big for
>>them and the machine speed will be OK (CVS is probably time consuming).
> 
> 
> see above ^^ . Speed shouldnt be a problem at all IMHO. And for the time
> being i hate to say i am afraid of other things but not the traffic MCF will
> be creating .. lol !!

What I have in mind is : why switching from SF that has big support and 
enough of everything to very small projects to big ones, to something we 
don't know if it can handle progression (MCF, Transors can become big, 
as big as DirectShow hopefully).

>>Great.
>>I'll be there for the launch party :) (in case you need a DJ ;)
> 
> 
> Hehe .. will you stream us some nice songs ?? But .. dont you dare to use
> Ogg container for that ..... Hahahahaha !! ;-)

Never done streaming. If it can pass through my ADSL yeah, I could do 
that :)





-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf