Re: [Mesa-dev] Mesa 12.1.0 release plan (Was Re: Next Mesa release, anyone?)

Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.mesa3d.announce,gmane.comp.video.mesa3d.devel
Message-ID <CACvgo51aAzRwRDpKppWyWjLzLrRWjCEJkZ80JS6raHby0CiLQQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 30 September 2016 at 02:31, Dave Airlie <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 30 September 2016 at 01:07, Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sep 29, 2016 7:56 AM, "Emil Velikov" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > It's been almost 4 months since the 12.0 branch was created, and soon
>>> > it will have been 3 months since Mesa 12.0 was released.
>>> >
>>> > Is there any reason we haven't created the stable branch yet?
>>> >
>>> > Ideally, we would time the release so that it's 1-2 months before fall
>>> > distribution releases.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Thanks Marek !
>>>
>>> In all honesty I was secretly hoping that we'll get Dave/Bas RADV for
>>> 12.1. With the topic of which would be 'the default' Vulkan driver for
>>> ATI/AMD hardware to be considered at a later stage.
>>
>> If they have even close to the amount of work we had to get it merged, I
>> don't think that's at all realistic.  Then again, Dave is the one who wants
>> to have a Vulkan driver for AMD hardware that he can package and ship so
>> I'll let him decide how badly he wants it in this release.
>>
>>> That said here are the tentative dates:
>>>
>>> Oct 7/14 2016 - Feature freeze/Release candidate 1
>>> Oct 14/21 2016 - Release candidate 2
>>> Oct 21/28 2016 - Release candidate 3/final release
>>>
>>> Fwiw I'm still in favour of getting RADV in even if it's not
>>> perfect/feature complete. Devs, let me know if there's a "must have"
>>> feature that we want in 12.1.
>
> The main problem I have with merging radv is the whole conformance testing
> end of it.
>
> It's probably fine if I just make a big printf on device creation that RADV
> isn't a conformant vulkan implementation yet. Sorta like what Intel do on the
> older GPUs.
>
That and/or having the install/setup stage require manual intervention
- similar to what we have for ilo/i965g.
Just throwing some ideas - whichever works for you really.

How well is RADV doing on the conformance side - mostly there or ?

Thanks
Emil
_______________________________________________
mesa-announce mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-announce
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.