time for amber2 branch?

Mike Blumenkrantz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.mesa3d.devel
Message-ID <CAHwmOzdkAOBLx4fw9PVLjzKCYcj4eWfDqEbGgKQUXX3p_sJ=ug@mail.gmail.com>
In looking at the gallium tree, I'm wondering if it isn't time for a second
amber branch to prune some of the drivers that cause pain when doing big
tree updates:

* nv30
* r300
* r600
* lima
* virgl
* tegra
* ???

There's nothing stopping these drivers from continuing to develop in an
amber branch, but the risk of them being broken by other tree refactorings
is lowered, and then we are able to delete lots of legacy code in the main
branch.

Thoughts?


Mike
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.