Re: time for amber2 branch?
Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.mesa3d.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAxE2A52OB0yyaxpyZ5XYy=CW-CFAXYTAs5hn_xjN1yzT4tdBg@mail.gmail.com> |
i915? tegra isn't really a driver. It just calls the gallium interface like trace, but without the tracing. crocus is in the same boat as r600. Marek On Wed, Jun 19, 2024, 10:34 Mike Blumenkrantz < [email protected]> wrote: > In looking at the gallium tree, I'm wondering if it isn't time for a > second amber branch to prune some of the drivers that cause pain when doing > big tree updates: > > * nv30 > * r300 > * r600 > * lima > * virgl > * tegra > * ??? > > There's nothing stopping these drivers from continuing to develop in an > amber branch, but the risk of them being broken by other tree refactorings > is lowered, and then we are able to delete lots of legacy code in the main > branch. > > Thoughts? > > > Mike >