Re: time for amber2 branch?

Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.mesa3d.devel
Message-ID <CAAxE2A52OB0yyaxpyZ5XYy=CW-CFAXYTAs5hn_xjN1yzT4tdBg@mail.gmail.com>
i915?

tegra isn't really a driver. It just calls the gallium interface like
trace, but without the tracing.

crocus is in the same boat as r600.

Marek

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024, 10:34 Mike Blumenkrantz <
[email protected]> wrote:

> In looking at the gallium tree, I'm wondering if it isn't time for a
> second amber branch to prune some of the drivers that cause pain when doing
> big tree updates:
>
> * nv30
> * r300
> * r600
> * lima
> * virgl
> * tegra
> * ???
>
> There's nothing stopping these drivers from continuing to develop in an
> amber branch, but the risk of them being broken by other tree refactorings
> is lowered, and then we are able to delete lots of legacy code in the main
> branch.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> Mike
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.