Re: Configure/build of Mesa-10.2.2

On 07/16/2014 04:20 PM, Noel Hunt wrote:
> I am trying to build xorg-server-1.15.2 on Solaris 11.1. I have
> built a myriad of tools so far and am now building Mesa, but
> after I run `configure' and then `gmake', it all collapses:
>
> CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /usr/bin/ksh93
> /home/noel/src3/xorg/lib/Mesa-10.2.2/bin/missing aclocal-1.14 -I m4
>   cd . && /usr/bin/ksh93
> /home/noel/src3/xorg/lib/Mesa-10.2.2/bin/missing automake-1.14 --foreign
> src/egl/drivers/dri2/Makefile.am:36: error: Libtool library used but
> 'LIBTOOL' is undefined
> src/egl/drivers/dri2/Makefile.am:36:   The usual way to define 'LIBTOOL'
> is to add 'LT_INIT'
> src/egl/drivers/dri2/Makefile.am:36:   to 'configure.ac
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://configure.ac&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=lGQMzzTgII0I7jefp2FHq7WtZ%2BTLs8wadB%2BiIj9xpBY%3D%0A&m=pxDVj2ZntoVdi6TXFBPv04aTX5L6K6ONN%2FEFXFTAbNg%3D%0A&s=d08ec9b6aa44b521a40e3fc05a9d82969baf062d37c03aaeb478926f28a3c45a>'
> and run 'aclocal' and 'autoconf' again.
> src/egl/drivers/dri2/Makefile.am:36:   If 'LT_INIT' is in 'configure.ac
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://configure.ac&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=lGQMzzTgII0I7jefp2FHq7WtZ%2BTLs8wadB%2BiIj9xpBY%3D%0A&m=pxDVj2ZntoVdi6TXFBPv04aTX5L6K6ONN%2FEFXFTAbNg%3D%0A&s=d08ec9b6aa44b521a40e3fc05a9d82969baf062d37c03aaeb478926f28a3c45a>',
> make sure
> src/egl/drivers/dri2/Makefile.am:36:   its definition is in aclocal's
> search path.
> src/egl/main/Makefile.am:32: error: Libtool library used but 'LIBTOOL'
> is undefined
>        .............
>
> and Makefiles are removed, rebuild, god only knows what is going on
> (LT_INIT is in `configure.ac
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://configure.ac&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=lGQMzzTgII0I7jefp2FHq7WtZ%2BTLs8wadB%2BiIj9xpBY%3D%0A&m=pxDVj2ZntoVdi6TXFBPv04aTX5L6K6ONN%2FEFXFTAbNg%3D%0A&s=d08ec9b6aa44b521a40e3fc05a9d82969baf062d37c03aaeb478926f28a3c45a>'
> by the way).
>
> Since none of the (hideous) automake/autoconf files have changed
> why on earth is make trying to rebuild the Makefiles? `Makefile'
> seems to depend on `config.status' which is absurb. Once I have
> run configure of course config.status will change.
>
> I have little tolerance for all this ridiculous complexity, but
> surprisingly,
> often, it seems to work. This particular installation doesn't. Maybe I
> should install linux.

I'm not an autoconf expert by any means, but are you sure you have 
libtool installed?

-Brian