Re: Support for xxpc chunks in AVI
Mats Peterson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.mplayer.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mats Peterson <[email protected]> skrev: (8 mars 2016 21:05:38 CET) >"Reimar Döffinger" <[email protected]> skrev: (8 mars 2016 >20:28:02 CET) >>On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 07:46:45AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote: >>> Since you've been so concerned about the whole xxpc chunk issue, >>Reimar, >>> when will we actually see support for xxpc chunks in the AVI demuxer >>in >>> MPlayer? >> >>The only thing I am concerned about is that either things are >>implemented properly, or if that's not considered worth it >>it's a conscious decision and documented, at the very >>least in FFmpeg. >>I have no intention to add new features to our AVI demuxer. >>Whether maybe FFmpeg's should be the default or if it's >>easy enough to print a messages suggesting to use FFmpeg's >>manually if such junks are encountered is a different >>question though. >>_______________________________________________ >>MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-dev-eng > >So am I, regarding things being implemented properly. The best thing >would probably be to index the xxpc "junks", as you call it, instead of >adding the palette to every keyframe, which would otherwise be needed. >Also, to have the demuxer use the right logic to set the correct >palette at a certain timestamp based on the xxpc indices. >-- >Mats Peterson >http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/ >_______________________________________________ >MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-dev-eng Or "xxpc index entries", rather. -- Mats Peterson http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/ _______________________________________________ MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-dev-eng