Re: offer to include gopher protocol support

Vincenzo Nicosia <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.mplayer.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 11:02:03PM +0100, Alexander Strasser wrote:
[cut]

> 
> Did you test it on some content? I didn't try playing media over gopher
> yet :)
>

Yes, it works, but having to put the ffmpeg:// scheme before the actual
gopher:// URL is quite awful (and a bit annoying).

> As mentioned by Nicolas, one could possibly improve the UI here. Like
> for example trying FFmpeg's protocols if MPlayer doesn't support the
> protocol.
> 
> I don't have time to work on this. So if you would like to look into
> that, it could be a bigger improvment to mplayer usability in general.
>

That's a good idea, and I am willing to work on that. It would be a
"if anything else fail, try ffmpeg://", which indeed would make a lot
of sense from the UI perspective, and would work for any protocol
supported by ffmpeg (i.e., not just for gopher :P).

Let me have a look at the code. I will come up with something and I
will send a patch for review soon.

HND

_______________________________________________
MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-dev-eng
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQSOWdaqRF79tKFTPVpfILOuC18GLwUCXhz9agAKCRBfILOuC18G
L8NSAKCDFk1KWz+szpV2Cj6zjZ/2XavSrQCdEEvamzHz9qDs+swVTaajWxjiQOI=
=yNht
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.