Re: dual licensing
Gabucino <[email protected]> Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:06:03 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.mplayer.g2.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Attila Kinali wrote: > Now the discussion whether it should be gpl/bsd or gpl/lgpl > isn't one at all (fortnunately or unfortunately ?). We already > use a lot of third party gpl/lgpl code which we cannot relicense > under bsd, thus we have to stick with gpl/lgpl. Let's continue this thread on mplayer-legal mailing list IMHO. -- Gabucino MPlayer Core Team _______________________________________________ MPlayer-G2-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-g2-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFAOI0bAq6GhkS0XDcRAuS2AJ9y3TAazMEom5RMX8IwFO3j6ioWCwCgrdza 8SRIPFJ6SMKX9ru8XrdYDWI= =1SWp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----