Re: dual licensing

On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:06:03PM +0100, Gabucino wrote:
> Attila Kinali wrote:
> > Now the discussion whether it should be gpl/bsd or gpl/lgpl
> > isn't one at all (fortnunately or unfortunately ?). We already
> > use a lot of third party gpl/lgpl code which we cannot relicense
> > under bsd, thus we have to stick with gpl/lgpl.
> Let's continue this thread on mplayer-legal mailing list IMHO.

This looks like a convenient way to move the discussion behind closed
doors and keep people who don't care about legal crap (mostly
packaging, codec patent, etc. issues) but who do care that the code
remain free from participating in the discussion...

Rich