Re: dual licensing try 2

On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:52:35PM -0500, D Richard Felker III wrote:
> It's very simple. I am opposed to involvement in any project which
> will result in the increase of non-free software, and I have no
> interest in being involved in a dual-licensed MPlayer.
> 
> Besides, it was already brought up that if non-free licenses are sold
> for only part of MPlayer, then lame proprietary software companies
> will just steal the rest of MPlayer too, and then the core developers
> won't pursue legal action against these companies because they're
> being paid by them. It's a clear conflict of interest.

I agree with this principle fully.

--Joey

-- 
"I know Kung Fu." --Darth Vader