Re: dual licensing try 2
Gabucino <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:48:52 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.mplayer.g2.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
D Richard Felker III wrote: > A deal is good, as long as it involves them releasing their whole > program under GPL or at least halting all production permenantly. This is why I suggested mplayer-legal.. > The ones wronged are all the people of the world who are unable to use their > sources, whether or not they want to, because of proprietary restrictions.) This is the RMS-ish viewpoint which is IMHO bullshit and every time I hear it, I get an itch. -- Gabucino MPlayer Core Team _______________________________________________ MPlayer-G2-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-g2-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFAOpFjAq6GhkS0XDcRAtEDAJoDC3pOGVCj4bAi1YM39GDDf7okTQCgid/i RqI5jBuvlRYHlLY3K2iCyW8= =tjhE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----