Re: Re: About final cfg.h (config layer 0 discussion)

Arpi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.mplayer.g2.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

> Sometime (on Sunday, May 25 at 15:18) I've received something...
> >> 2. Do you still have something to argue about CONF_TYPE_LIST option type?
> 
> >isn't my CONF_TYPE_SELECT the same?
> 
> no.
> CONF_TYPE_SELECT is to select _one_ option from list of available ones
> (for example, combobox). CONF_TYPE_LIST is box for selection, remove, and
> reorder options from list (box with two fields, for example - left is
> selected list, right is available options list). These are too different
> and CONF_TYPE_LIST may have items with different type (see my example
> earlier).

ah, now i see.
but why do we need such type? i can't imagine any use.

> >> 4. Let's change unsigned short type, version to unsigned short version,
> >>   type in module_info_t definition to have compatibility forever. :)
> 
> >no
> >i'm thinking about add type-specific versions
> >so if we change vf API we don't have to force demuxer, stream, vo etc plugin
> >authors/users to recompile their plugins just to get version number bumped.
> 
> Is there a difference between
> 
> unsigned short type, version;
> 
> and
> 
> unsigned short version, type;
> 
> anyway? This is anyway from this new API so I think it's easy. I'm
> thinkig about module loader only - putting unsigned short version as
> first member of struct will let us change that structure in the future
> and still have version check available.

but as i said, i want type dependant version, so version number without type
is useless.

> >>     Discussion about CONF_TYPE_GROUP isn't my concern right now since
> >> that option is application level only and it's marked as TODO anyway. :)
> 
> >actually i've added CONF_TYPE_MODULE which does the same as you expected
> >from CONF_TYPE_GROUP.
> 
> no. :)
> I've explained that by examples earlier - submenus in GUI aren't modules,
> are they? I'll try to explain a bit more - see the menu for video encoder
> GUI:
> 
>   File  Video  Audio  Tools  About
> +      ---------+
> | Open...       |
> | Save...       |
> |---------------|+----------+
> | Save stream...|  Audio... |
> | File info     |+ Video... |
> |---------------|| Text...  |
> | Quit          |+----------+
> +---------------+
> 
> You have menu group 'File' and subgroup in 'Save stream...' option in it.
> I've explained good now? :)

not
this example is not related to config layer at all.
such menus are built by gui and not by config stuff.

> Another example for using of CONF_TYPE_GROUP:
> 
> (*) constant quantizer [   ]
> ( ) variable quantizer ----------------------------
> minimum quant [  ]   maximum quant [  ]
> ...................
> ---------------------------------------------------
> 
> so we have CONF_TYPE_SELECT with two choises:
> 1) CONF_TYPE_GROUP including 'vqscale' integer.
> 2) CONG_TYPE_GROUP including 'vqmin', 'vqmax' and other options.
> 
> When we select constant quantizer then second group will be disabled,
> when we select second group then we cannot change value of 'vqscale'.
> Config of vf_lavc must have hints for that. Simplest way for it is just
> have "transparent" CONG_TYPE_GROUP type. Did you understand?

and how would you define the above situation with your types?
i can't see how you GROUP helps here.
also can't see what is the difference between yoru GROUP and my MODULE,
except the name.

> If we don't preserve that availability in config struct then GUI maker
> will have to create own config struct that will allow that by copying all
> from existing ve_lavc config but with changed a bit structure and then
> keep it up to date forever. It's too bad and we wanted to avoid that,
> aren't we?

of course

> BTW, this sample explaining why I wanted to have CONF_TYPE_SELECT as
> subconig type too - config_select_list_t doesn't allow us to have choises
> as CONG_TYPE_GROUP but these must be available for GUI. ;)

but it's a mess to allow different tyopes/pointers in each selection


A'rpi / Astral & ESP-team

--
Developer of MPlayer G2, the Movie Framework for all - http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.