Re: Better picture for mplayer-dvb

Sebastian Kemper <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.mplayer.user.dvb
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Nico Sabbi schrieb:
> Sebastian Kemper wrote:
> 
>> Hello list,
>>
>> yesterday I tried different postprocessing filters on my dvb. I think 
>> I read all posts to this list concerning blockiness, the dvb card not 
>> liking bitrates higher then 5000 etc. In the beginning I thought my 
>> VDR was too slow for say lavc=2 (AMD 1700+), but after writing the 
>> mpegpes to disk an then replaying it the dvb still refused to play the 
>> movie fluently. So I think there's a bitrate barrier on the dvb card.
> 
> 
> Can you explain how your computer is configured and what you are trying 
> to do exactly?
> Do you have a FF or a budget card? Maybe FF have such a bitrate barrier, 
> but imo it's unlikely.
> 
I got a FF rev.1.5. The mobo is an NForce2.
>>
>> I think it should be possible to even get a good picture with 
>> lavc=5000 if one uses postprocessing. But I didn't find the "cure" 
>> yet. Two things: I'm not sure which postprocessing filter(s) to use 
>> and where to place them in the -vop (respectfully -vf) list.
>>
>> Until now I tried different combinations with pp=hb:a/vb:a/dr and 
>> changing the decoder to xvid using -xvidopts 
>> deblock-chroma:deblock-luma[:dr2]. Also I tried to change the 
>> sharpness of the bicubic scaler.
>> I placed the changes in mplayer.sh:
>>
>>
> 
> what does xvid have to do with all this? I'm more and more confused
By default XVID gets decoded by ffmpeg (have a look into codecs.conf). I 
used the xvid codec to decompress to see if the picture gets better 
because my vids are mostly xvid. But it didn't change the picture as far 
as I could see,
> 
>>
>> -vop 
>> pp=hb:a/vb:a/dr,$VOP:$NEW_FPS,expand=$NEW_X:$REAL_Y:-1:-1:1,scale=$NEW_X:${NEW_Y}:0:0:100 
>>
>>
>> -vop 
>> $VOP:$NEW_FPS,pp=hb:a/vb:a/dr,expand=$NEW_X:$REAL_Y:-1:-1:1,scale=$NEW_X:${NEW_Y}:0:0:100 
>>
>>
>> -vop -xvidopts deblock-chroma:deblock-luma[:dr2] 
>> $VOP:$NEW_FPS,expand=$NEW_X:$REAL_Y:-1:-1:1,scale=$NEW_X:${NEW_Y}:0:0:100
>>
>> I think my VDR was too slow for the xvid codecs internal 
>> postprocessing :)
>>
>> The problem is I don't really know which position in the -vop list 
>> (for pp=...) is the best. I read about postprocessing being placed 
>> best before YUV conversion. But I'm not sure what that is :) Maybe you 
>> can tell me where to place these options.
> 
> 
> 
> This is a question for mplayer-users.
Allthough I tried different positions in the -vop list none seemed to 
have any effect on the TV output. The only thing that seems to change 
the quality is playing with lavc=... But as I mentioned earlier there 
seems to be a boundary (skips occur).
> 
>>
>> Another thing is, my friend still got a Windows system, a P3 700MHz, 
>> and when he plays DivX on his computer (on a normal monitor, no dvb 
>> hardware) the picture looks awesome: No blocks and, allthough he's got 
>> "slower" hardware, it never skips. On my laptop the picture isn't that 
>> perfect with mplayer. I don't have skips because it's a Pentium-M with 
>> 1.4GHz and I use -vo xv, but it's far more blocky. My friend uses VLC 
>> on his Windows system btw.
>> I think having a postprocessing filter like that could even help with 
>> mplayer-dvb (before lavc=5000?), but I didn't find an equivalent yet. 
>> Are the same filters available for mplayer as they are for a Windows 
>> VLC? Where would you place postprocessing filter in the -vop list?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Sebastian
> 
> 
> 
> The major difference I can think of is that mplayer by default decodes 
> mpeg12 with libmpeg2, vlc with lavc.
> Use -vc ffmpeg12, to change behavior
I'm not decoding MPEG2. I'm decoding DivX. :)

Laters

Sebastian

> 
> _______________________________________________
> MPlayer-dvb mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-dvb
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.