Re: [xine-devel] Re: libdvdread and xine 1.0alpha compilation
[email protected] (Guenter Bartsch)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.ogle.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hi there, > >> Since xine-lib don't accept any C++ comments, here is a small pathc > >> to fix comments in libdvdread (made against 0.9.3). > > > > > >The C++ type of comments has been in the _C-standard_ for several years > >now. Is there any particualar reason why Xine doesn't allow them. It > >seems to me that Xine should change their compile options instead. > > > >/v > > CFLAGS just change (-std=gnu89)to be Ansi C strict (no //, no > variable declartion in a middle of a block, etc...). So, i don't think that > will change back. actually the decision was made that the -std=gnu89 flag should not be set for sources importet from external projects. cheers, guenter -- (1) Alexander the Great was a great general. (2) Great generals are forewarned. (3) Forewarned is forearmed. (4) Four is an even number. (5) Four is certainly an odd number of arms for a man to have. (6) The only number that is both even and odd is infinity. Therefore, Alexander the Great had an infinite number of arms.