Re: Ogle and SUN's Forte compilers..
H}kan Hjort <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.ogle.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Fri Jan 10 2003, Vincent Cojot wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Martin [ISO-8859-1] Norbäck wrote: > > > fre 2003-01-10 klockan 16.10 skrev Vincent Cojot: > > > Has anyone tried to compile ogle with Sun's Forte compilers on Solaris? > > > > The cvs version should compile fine with Forte. > > > This is great news, I will try that tonight.. :) Do you have any > idea if it's worth the trouble (Does it make a difference in performance)? Yes 10% or so I think, drop by on #ogle at irc.freenode.net if you want to talks to some other Sparc Solaris users. > Also, I was planning to only compile ogle with Forte and leave libdvdread, > libdvdcsss as gcc-compiled shared libraries in order to avoid breaking > other applications ( I thought most of the processing happens in ogle but > if you have other suggestions, I am a taker..) Thanks for reading and for > the quick reply.. > I'm afraid it's a bit more diffucult than that. You _must_ use the cvs version of libdvdread as the layout of some structs have changed to allow compilation with Forte, and since it has changed it breaks binary compatability! According to the 'versioning recomendations' for libtool the so version in cvs has not been changed, it will change when we do a release. This will stop you from using this version and keeping the old one at the same time. You could change the so version yourself just trying to point out that all this is non trivial. Maybe it would be better to bump the so version in cvs anyway... or just wait untill the next release. -- Håkan Hjort