Re: Ogle on Solaris 8, Major success and a little tiny problem..
H}kan Hjort <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.ogle.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Wed Sep 04 2002, Vincent S. Cojot wrote: > > Hello Hakan, > > > We don't have such a cool graphics card here (or machine for that > > matter) (We 'just' SubBlade 1000 1*600MHz with Creator3D or Elite3D > > m6). > > First of all, thanks for your reply. Well, the Creator3d and Elite3d should > also exhibit this problem if you manage to use the default configuration. Yes I know, we've experienced this before. > One way to try this is to escape to a command line login from the CDE > dtlogin program and start openwindows with the default 8bpp root window: > > /usr/openwin/bin/openwin -dev /dev/fbs/ffb0 defdepth 8 > Don't run CDE (thank god) so we have a xdm loggin session and no access to beable to start the X server ourselfs. > Verify with xdpyinfo that you still get 1,8,24 depths with 8bpp being the > default. That should reproduce the problem. > > Also, about the patch.. perhaps we should protect these lines with > "#ifdef __sun___".. What do you think? I do think that it is portable since > it's taken from xmms and is just plain gtk. > I'll defer that to people that are more well versed in the workings of GTK. > > I've gatherd that the XVR-1000 and above line of graphics cards might > > give better preformance if one doesn't use mediaLib to scale the image > > and XShmPutImage it but instead use a OpenGL texture maped output. > > mplayer has such anoutput mode and hopefully this could be adapted to > > Ogle without to much work. > > That's interesting.. I didn't know that OpenGL pixel rendering could be > faster than XShm on that machine... At least, can we keep both versions of > the routines together so we get the choice from ./configure when/if you > introduce OpenGL pixel rendering? > Yes, it should be selectable at runtime preferably. No time and not much motivation for working on this sice we don't have a good machine to test on, a nice project for some one that feels like it though. > I have another question: Since I am compiling with gcc-2.95.2 from the Sun > Software Companion, my ogle libs get linked to the sparcv8plus+vis2 version > of the Medialib.. Would I gain something by using a 64bit compiler and the > sparcv9+vis2 version of Medialib? If you any idea... > I don't think so, but we haven't tested. Only GCC can be used to compile libdvdread and it's headers, so unfortunatly Forte can't be used (without quite some messing about). -- Håkan Hjort