Re: OpenEXR v2.1.0 released

Piotr Stanczyk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.openexr.devel
Message-ID <95F01873F66DA54DAD2734EEBF98F86C01109A4F20@mailbox09.lucas.alllucas.com>
Hmm- that is odd. 

The missing files you refer to are indeed installed on a fresh run for me.  Would you let me know how you are building the code base?

On *nix systems the recommended path is still via autoconf. CMake is still being worked on largely. 

Thanks \
- Piotr

________________________________________
From: Rex Dieter [[email protected]]
Sent: 27 November 2013 09:27
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OpenEXR v2.1.0 released

Piotr Stanczyk wrote:

> OpenEXR v2.1.0 has been released and is available for download. This
> release includes the following components (version locked):
>
>   *   OpenEXR: v2.1.0
>   *   IlmBase: v2.1.0
>   *   PyIlmBase: v2.1.0
>   *   OpenEXR_Viewers: v2.1.0


I'm seeing several header-related failures with this release so far,
including:

1. OpenEXR_Viewers-2.1.0 build fails, references to non-existent header:

In file included from ImageView.cpp:43:0:
ImageView.h:44:28: fatal error: namespaceAlias.h: No such file or directory
 #include "namespaceAlias.h"

I see openexr itself includes several copies of a namespaceAlias.h header,
should it be installed as part of the public API or should OpenEXR_Viewers
include a copy of it too?


2.  Applications that build against openexr, fail due to references another
missing header:

/usr/include/OpenEXR/ImfStandardAttributes.h:60:40: fatal error:
ImfDeepImageStateAttribute.h: No such file or directory

Should this header be installed (per 'make install'), or the reference to it
removed?

-- Rex
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.