Re: looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build
Nick <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.openexr.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Music to my ears. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 13, 2014, at 16:29, "Halfdan Ingvarsson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > They should; unless I forgot to commit something to the github repo (I deliberately left out some highly build-specific bits that make the output conform to our tools library). Also, only cmake builds are supported. > > The branch deviates from the master branch in the two important respects: > 1) Iex::BaseExc does *not* derive from std::string (this was preventing successful MSVC2012 builds). > 2) There's no CreateDLL (sp?) step required. All exports of public symbols are properly and consistently accounted for. This work also adds support for OSX/Linux DSO symbol visibility. > > - ½ > >> On 14-06-13 06:48 PM, Nick wrote: >> In a similar vein (apologies if the same one?) - if one does a clean pull of the sidefx fork, does it compile and build and pass unit tests out of the box? >> >> Sent from my iPhone > _______________________________________________ Openexr-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel