Re: looking for a working 2.0.1 Windows build
Michel Lerenard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.openexr.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/17/2014 04:37 PM, Nick wrote: > For quite a while we maintained vcproj's for EXR - that works but you > end up needing to keep old copies of visual studio around to make sure > that it builds for 2008, 2010, 2012, ...., and then you need to run > regressions on every variant to make sure nothing broke. It gets > really time consuming. I think the same argument would hold for > xcodeproj files. As far as I know, the same argument is applied when using CMake: at some point you have to compile the source and use Visual. As I see it, no maintainer today is able to check all versions of the compilers, with or without CMake. CMake solves nothing but adds a layer of complexity because configuring is neither trivial nor intuitive. _______________________________________________ Openexr-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel