Re: Slow deep exr

Hi, Thorsten.

El 29/05/17 a las 04:21, Thorsten Kaufmann escribió:
>
> Hey there,
>
> so there is no "deep vs. beauty". It's simply a deepscanline image. I 
> don't think it is even possible to mix
>
> deep and non-deep images, is it?
>
>
No, but my understanding was that the deep and beauty info live in 
different parts of the image.
>
> Deep is not an additional set of information but it stores all of the 
> regular information in a more granular way.
>
> So there is both more data to read and you more "work to do" (to blend 
> the individual samples) which makes
>
> reading deep images slower. The amount of additional samples depends a 
> lot on the type of image you have
>
> motionblur, dof making things way worse and of course on the 
> renderer's implamentation and if samples
>
> are merged and how.
>
>

So you mean that the beauty pic is composed of the deep samples? There's 
no decoupling of the deep and beauty data?  That doesn't sound right.  I 
remind you I only want to load the beauty picture, not the deep data (of 
which I have no use for now).

Thank you for looking into this,

-- 
Gonzalo Garramuño

_______________________________________________
Openexr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel