Re: EXR layer naming conventions

Just to add some more fuel to the fire: has anybody been using EXR to  
store stereo data?
If so how? "left" and "right" layers? etc, etc.

My inclination is to write them as:

	left.[RGBAZ]
	right.[RGBAZ]

and if there are additional layers (e.g.):

	left.diffuse.[RGB]
	right.diffuse.[RGB]

But it seems like nailing down "left" and "right" (and/or "center")  
would be a good idea
along with any accompanying attributes (matrices).

	-Jim


On Jun 28, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Jim Hourihan wrote:

>
> Hi All, I was wondering how people are using EXR layers. Especially  
> how the layers are being named and if there are any defacto  
> standards out there.
>
> For example:
>
> 	channels: R G B A Z diff.red diff.green diff.blue ...
>
> Where the diff layer has slightly different channel naming  
> convention than the "default" layer.  I assume that some of these  
> things are a result of matching channel/layer names to shader  
> parameters. A brief email conversation with Florian produced the  
> idea that some sort of recommended best practices might established  
> for layer naming, but I'm wondering if that's even feasible.
>
> I'm also interested in whether people are using EXR to hold stereo  
> pairs and if so how.
>
> Thanks.
>
> 	-Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openexr-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-user