Re: Re: VNC support

I too had a look and reached the same conclusion, then I noticed that a 
refactoring was mentioned on the website and that this also included talk of 
using a different build tool.  I thought I might wait until then to have 
another look at it.

How big a job would it be to port the current build job to jam? or is there 
another build tool that would be better?

Simon.


3/02/2003 7:08:45 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>Message: 8
>Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 20:22:13 +0100
>From: Martin Doering <[email protected]>
>To: Micah Dowty <[email protected]>
>Cc: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Pgui-devel] Re: VNC support
>
>On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:04:55 -0700
>Micah Dowty <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> pgserver should be pretty easy to port to win32, but I don't even have
>> a working windows machine and nobody else has done it :)
>
>Well, not that I had the time (  ;-) ), but what did stay me away from it
>is, that there are so many things in the current pgserver directory, what
>is totally Unix specific, that I think the problem would not be the code,
>but the tings around, like auto* and such.
>
>--
>Martin





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com