Re: PicoGUI 1.0?

> > > If this effort is to succeed, we would like to ask all developers
> > > who have a few hours to help out.  If Micah and I are to do this
> > > alone, it will take more time than you are probably willing to wait
> > > ;-)
> > 
> > 	Is there a tasklist to choose from?
> 
> Yes, in the page I posted:
> http://picogui.org/wiki/view/Main/PicoGUI1dot0
> (or you can pick some task that is not in the list but you want to see
> in 1.0)

Is there already something written in the page? I have only the wiki title
and a blank page...

> The list is not too big now, but some items need to be expanded in
> sub-items and some still need discussion.  Specially, WidgetFoundry is
> our "GUI layout tool" (comparable to glade); we want it "complete" for
> 1.0 but we don't yet know what "complete" means.

Is this point really important?
It's like waiting for a stable version of glade before releasing gtk,
isn't it?
I see the WidgetFoundry as a PicoGUI tool and not as a part of
the PicoGUI ~ui toolkit~.
In comparison with themetools that is needed to customise the look of
your application, the WidgetFoundry is not necessary to create it.

Maybe PicoGUI have to be split in something like :

  * picogui-uitoolkit (server + clients)
  * picogui-themec (theme compiler, example, extra-themes)
  * picogui-widgetfoundry (The WidgetFoundry)

with some dependences between the packages.

Just my own vision of the project...
-philippe


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com