Re: (no subject)

Frederic Wagner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.picogui.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 03:34:23PM +0000, ciara mulvihill wrote:
> hey Ronan and Ciara here, 
> 

hi,

> We are 3rd year computer science students doing a project. 
> It involves building an embedded system. 
> We are going to run an 486 embedded architecture emulator and we are considering
> what embedded operating system to run over this. 
> We're probally going for TinyX or PicoGUI. 
> Any thoughts, advantages disadvantages?

I personnaly tried both on my laptop (486 with 4megs of RAM)

and tinyX isn't a valid option. I mean, ok it launches but it is awfully
slooow. maybe with 8Megs of ram it's better.

picogui may be a bit young, but it runs quickly enough to be usable, and
I can even pay myself the luxury to have themes.

that being said, there is a counterpart : you'll have to learn an other
API, and the number of applications is less than in tinyX.

my personnal thought : picogui is fast, doesn't eat a lot of memory, and nice
looking. it sure isn't suited for everyday use, but for a computer science
project it should be really nice.

Wagner Frederic

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Unix - where you can throw the manual on the keyboard and get a command


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.