Re: current picGUI status

Am Sonntag, 21. M=E4rz 2004 21:10 schrieb [email protected]:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 01:06:09PM +0100, Raphael Mack wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 21. M?rz 2004 12:17 schrieb [email protected]:
> > any suggestions? - I search something that is fast, small, that doesn't
> > need X (fbdev), it should have a easy C-interface (or directly Eiffel,
> > but I gave that up and made friends with creating a wrapper). I don't
> > need all these things like tooltips...
>
> What's wrong with tinyx/kdrive and gtk?

I don't exactly know, I didn't test it on the target system, but as I compi=
led=20
gtk on my development machine, I had the impression that there are many=20
dependencies, like pango, freetype, ... and the whole thing will become big=
=2E=20
GTK is very compfortable and supports many things I really don't need, that=
's=20
why I would like s. th. smaller. - I know that for example the size of the=
=20
packages doesn't always say too much about the size and speed of the=20
resulting binary, but it at least a bit I think... This was just an=20
impression I didn't have with picogui...

I didn't take a closer look to matchbox, but I will check it out. Thanks.

Rapha



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click