Re: Addendum re: the framebuffer issue

On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 20:19 +0000, Andrew Church wrote:
> I forgot to comment on this in my previous message, but would it resolve
> the issue if we enforced singlethreaded filtering?  If so, I think that
> would probably be the best idea for 1.1.0, rather than throwing in a
> whole new block of code right before release.  For the majority of use
> cases, I imagine encoders could make better use of multiple threads than
> filters could anyway.

That's one of my major concerns during development.

The actual hangup it was caused by a sum of circumstances, that was not
only a fault of the framebuffer.

But probably it's worth doing a further step back and retry fixing 1.1.0
using old framebuffer code.

I'm also convinced that in HEAD it's (very) worth go ahead with new
approach.

Working on.

Bests,

-- 
Francesco Romani // Ikitt
http://fromani.exit1.org  ::: transcode homepage
http://tcforge.berlios.de ::: transcode experimental forge