Re: [HEADS UP][RFC] Changes to the trascode 1.2.0+ installed tree (2/2)

>Seems to work like a charm, and that dazzled me.
>I was pretty confident that the static linking would have failed because
>multiple shared object loaded into the same executable would have the
>same symbol visible.
>But the dynamic linker apparently doesn't care about that (or at least
>it doesn't complain loudly).
>No symbol clash, no complains, no warning, anything.

There's actually a good reason why this works--but I'd hate to spoil
the fun of figuring it out for yourself.  Or else I'm just too lazy to
write it up at the moment. :)

  --Andrew Church
    [email protected]
    http://achurch.org/