Re: [RFC] Suggestion for cleanup "Configuring interfaces" semantics in vls.cfg

Tristan Leteurtre <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.video.videolan.vls.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003, Jean-Paul Saman wrote:
> What do other people think? Agree or don't agree.

I totally agree. The fact is this new interface modularization is quite
experimental and is not finished, so the priority was not to clean up
the config file :p. 

There is still some problems about interfaces :
. SIG not well handled
. When launching several interface, the threaded ones are not able to
  handle an incoming connexion.
. I guess there is a thread-safe issue, since a segfault is haging
  around....

So, I should correct those issues before anything else...

-- 
Tristan
-- 
This is the vls-devel mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/streaming/
To unsubscribe, please read http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
If you are in trouble, please contact <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.