Re: Bug in VLS-0.5.0
"Claude Duvallet" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.videolan.vls.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <005e01c2f0a1$3e3903c0$f501a8c0@skinner> |
Thank you for your answer. Is there any reasons for the difference of version between the cvs (0.4.5) and the tarball (0.5.0). Is there a specif branch to retrieve the last version on CVS ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexis de Lattre" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 7:00 PM Subject: [vls-devel] Re: Bug in VLS-0.5.0 > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003, Claude Duvallet wrote : > > Dernier problème v4l ne marche plus depuis que j'ai récupéré la version > > tarball de vls-0.5.0 ??? Et donc plus de possibilité de connecter une > > webcam ! > > As stated on this page : > > http://www.videolan.org/streaming/features.html > > V4L input is a "CVS only" feature until the next VLS release. > > -- > Alexis > -- > This is the vls-devel mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/streaming/ > To unsubscribe, please read http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html > If you are in trouble, please contact <[email protected]> > > -- This is the vls-devel mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/streaming/ To unsubscribe, please read http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html If you are in trouble, please contact <[email protected]>