Re: Matroska

ChristianHJW <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.general,gmane.comp.video.xine.codec.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Mike Melanson wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Jim Leonard wrote:
>>
>>I have to admit, I have no idea why we needed another container format.  What
>>was wrong with MPEG-4?
> 
> 
> 	Ooh, ouch, I hope you're ready for a good flaming...:) Not from
> me, but from the hordes of Quicktime-format-haters out there who hate
> official MPEG-4 files even more because they're a bizarre extension of QT.
> 	But you won't get it from me because I am a big fan of QT.
> 	-Mike Melanson

;) .... from me neither, MP4 is pretty nice for what its made for.

About matroska, we currently have

XviD
DivX 3/4/5
WMV9
MPEG4V1/2/3
RealVideo ( rv 10,20,30,40 = RV9 )
any VCM codec

MP3
AC3
DTS
AAC
AAC SBR
Vorbis
FLAC
MP2
RA8
RALF
ATRAC
CELP
any ACM codec

SRT
SSA
ASS
Vobsub
Vobsub/zlib

chapters
track names
tags
attachements

supported in matroska already, and in any combination and unlimited 
number of tracks.

I know this all, in theory, could have been done with MOV also, but i 
dont know of any existing software that actually does it ;) ?

About Arpi's rant( C++ ) : we have a nice working C lib now, made by 
Ronald 'BBB' Bultje, in L-GPL. Its the base for his matroska gstreamer 
plugin, and in gstreamer CVS.

Christian
matroska project admin
http://www.matroska.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.