Re: 2:2 pulldown.
Jim Leonard <[email protected]> Sat, 04 Dec 2004 11:50:08 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.xine.codec.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > On DVDs the "Progressive frame flag" is next to useless, for historic > reasons. Why do you say that? Progressive DVD players still take advantage of that flag... > So, does anyone know of an automated way to discover if a PAL DVD > contains film content (frames) or TV content (interlaced fields) To tackle this, I would assume that all content is interlaced, so you would seperate the fields out and double the rate (ie, 25i content would become 50p). Then I would watch for repeating frames (using a threshold for noise of course). If the program "sees" the picture changing all the time (like change-change-change-change) then it's interlaced; if it sees changes every other frame only (like change-same-change-same) then the source was progressive. The folks at doom9.org can probably point you to something. -- Jim Leonard ([email protected]) http://www.oldskool.org/ Want to help an ambitious games project? http://www.mobygames.com/ Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/