Performance and quality of xine-lib
Gero Mudersbach <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.xine.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, recently I noticed that xine-lib-based audio players (like amarok or kaffeine) seem to use more cpu time than for example VLC. It sometimes is more than 10% in comparisson to VLC. Also the quality of mp3-playback seems to be lower (sound diversity, some frequencies are skipped) than the quality of VLC. I tested this on different machines with different soundcards. Has somebody made similar experiences? Best regards Gero ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ xine-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xine-user