Re: Adding SSE2 asm codes for color space transforming funcion
"Xwen.Kong" <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:16:34 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.xvid.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes, I only test it on Intel Celoron processor, are there any tools or documents to evaluate the codes performance ? now what I use is Intel(R) VTune(TM) Performance Analyzer. 2009/6/19 Jason Garrett-Glaser <[email protected]> > > movlps [edi + 32],xmm0 ; movlps + movhps are faster than one movdqu :) > > Only on Athlon 64, probably. > > On Phenom and Nehalem it will be most definitely slower, and probably > slower on basically everything else too. > > Also, since the shuffle unit is slow on the Conroe, that code will > almost certainly be slower than the MMX version on Conroe. > > Dark Shikari > _______________________________________________ > Xvid-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel >