Re: Questions / Bug fixes / Patches
Carl Eric Codere <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.video.xvid.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Greetings there!
Well actually, you are correct, I am really sorry to have made you waste time with this. After further verification, the nodrop option produces correct video output with a constant bitrate.
Nonetheless, I think the frame_drop_ratio=0 might still be useful, what do you think, was it the original syntax goal? Otherwise, just remove that part of my patch...
Thanks for all your help!
Best regards,
Carl
--- On Thu, 8/19/10, Michael Militzer <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Michael Militzer <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] Questions / Bug fixes / Patches
> To: [email protected]
> Received: Thursday, August 19, 2010, 5:49 PM
> Hi,
>
> I'm still not sure that there is a problem with MP4Box at
> all. When I look
> at the console output that you posted using the "-nodrop"
> option things
> appear to be fine actually: There's no message about
> variable framerate
> and all input frames seem to have been imported (at least
> it's exactly 28
> frames more imported than without "-nodrop"). It looks like
> MP4Box is
> simply converting the N_VOPs to P_VOPs and this is
> indicated by the
> "Removed 28 N-VOPs" message.
>
> So: Are you sure that the resulting .mp4 file from the
> "MP4Box -nodrop"
> command really is variable framerate and that not all input
> frames got
> imported?
>
> Regards,
> Michael