Re: a leak (maybe?)
"M. Rangnathan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.voip.nist-sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hagai, Please cvs update. I think I have fixed the issue. Do give it a quick test and tell me if you still have a problem. Ranga Hagai Sela (TA) wrote: >Hi, >Maybe you mean Dialog.delete? I couldn't find Transaction.delete in the last build. > >Hagai. > >-----Original Message----- >From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: ה 06 אפריל 2006 17:05 >To: Hagai Sela (TA) >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [nist-sip] a leak (maybe?) > > >Hagai, > >You can use transaction.delete() for the time being to get by but yes >this does look suspicious and I need to fix it. >Ranga > >Hagai Sela (TA) wrote: > > > >>Hi, >> >>I thought the stack has leaks a few times before, and it turned out to >>be my fault, but this one looks for real. It happens in this scenario >>(A is my nist-sip based UA). >> >>1. A sends an INVITE request to B. >> >>2. B answers with 100 and 180. >> >>3. B’s Ethernet cable is pulled out so it can’t send anything. >> >>4. A sends CANCEL. >> >>5. A’s CANCEL transaction times out. I don’t receive a transaction >>timeout for the INVITE transaction. >> >>I checked the transaction table 5 minutes after this call, the INVITE >>transaction still exists in the transaction table. Longer expirements >>indicated that it stays there forever. >> >>Any ideas why this happens? >> >>Hagai. >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>_______________________________________________ >>nist-sip mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nist-sip >> >> >> >> > > > > -- M. Ranganathan Advanced Networking Technologies Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8920, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. tel:301 975 3664 , fax:301 590 0932 http://w3.antd.nist.gov/ Advanced Networking Technologies For the People!