Re: Problem using transactions when forking requests

Michael

Please take a look at examples/forked/invite

I believe it does what you want and I believe it works. It should give 
you a pattern from which you can work. Do cvs update from the NIST 
repository.

Regards,

Ranga

Michalis Michail wrote:

>Hi,again
>
>I am trying to build a statefull forking proxy ,but i am having truble using
>Transactions.When i fork the incoming invite request ,into to two seperate
>requests ,i cannot add a different ServerTransction to the second request.So
>when a response arrives to the proxy i can only send one response back by
>using the ServerTransaction.Also i have the same problem with the user agent
>that created originally the request and sent it via the proxy.It can only
>receive only one of the incoming responses.Because of that i cannot create two
>different Dialogs as a result of the forked invite request. 
>I was wondering if there is another way to send and receive the responses to
>the forked request statefully without having to send and receive them statlessly.
>Or if that is not possible how can i create a Dialog  by sending statelessly
>the   invite requests and also receiving statelessly the following responses.   
>
>Thank you Michael. 
>
>_______________________________________________
>nist-sip mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nist-sip
>
>  
>


-- 
M. Ranganathan 

Advanced Networking Technologies Division,
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8920, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. 
tel:301 975 3664 , fax:301 590 0932 http://w3.antd.nist.gov/
Advanced Networking Technologies For the People!