Re: NIST-SIP 55 CAPS on my laptop and counting!

62 cps for both.

1 bug though....
when "gov.nist.javax.sip.REENTRANT_LISTENER" is set to true..
you have to synchronize  Shootist::byeCount, the 8-way would always assert 
on the test about missing bye's, and never complete the test until i did 
this.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "M. Rangnathan" <[email protected]>
To: "Matt Porter" <[email protected]>
Cc: "sip mailing" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: [nist-sip] NIST-SIP 55 CAPS on my laptop and counting!


> Another config param I forgot to set for multiprocessor -- 
> REENTRANT_LISTENER = true
> Also please edit ProtocolObjects and set the THREAD_POOL_SIZE 
> appropriately
>
> 1 is the right setting for uniprocessor. Set it to
>
> Do revert to us with a quick test run. Thanks!
>
> Ranga
>
>
> Matt Porter wrote:
>
>> i didnt inspect anything just ran the test as the were and got this..
>>
>> dual-core 2.8:        58 cps
>> 8 way 2.8 zeon  (4 CPU's with hyperthreading):      62 cps
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "M. Rangnathan" <[email protected]>
>> To: "sip mailing" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 9:27 PM
>> Subject: [nist-sip] NIST-SIP 55 CAPS on my laptop and counting!
>>
>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I got rid of all my synchornized data structures and replaced them all 
>>> with equivalent concurrent library synchronized hashmaps and such. I ran 
>>> the following experiment:
>>>
>>> UAC to UAS call setup and teardown with the UAS tears down the call. I 
>>> set the thread pool size to unconstrained (hmm.. negates previous 
>>> hypothesis). I ran 1000 concurrent Dialogs and averaged call 
>>> setup/teardown per call over 1000 calls. My measured thruput on my 
>>> single processor laptop is 55 Calls / Second ( I measure the average 
>>> time between INVITE and BYE ). I ran this in self test mode. The test is 
>>> in src/test/load/concurrency/
>>>
>>> Can somebody repeat the test and report results and also examine the 
>>> test code (it is quite small).
>>>
>>> Would anybody like to run this using SIPP on their multiprocessor 
>>> machine and do a scalability analysis ( i.e. scalability with respect to 
>>> number of processors / rate of INVITEs etc. ). I will try to devise a 
>>> mechansm to deal with flooding attacks (yetanudder stack configuration 
>>> parameter ugh! ).
>>> The harder we work at it the faster it goes.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ranga
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> M. Ranganathan
>>> Advanced Networking Technologies Division,
>>> National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
>>> 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8920, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. tel:301 975 3664 , 
>>> fax:301 590 0932 http://w3.antd.nist.gov/
>>> Advanced Networking Technologies For the People!
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nist-sip mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nist-sip
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> M. Ranganathan
> Advanced Networking Technologies Division,
> National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
> 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8920, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. tel:301 975 3664 , 
> fax:301 590 0932 http://w3.antd.nist.gov/
> Advanced Networking Technologies For the People!
>