Re: Provisional response for BYE Request

"Jeroen van Bemmel" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.voip.nist-sip
Message-ID <002701c6a57f$1938a490$31713b51@BEMBUSTER>
Shanthi,

Under certain circumstances, a 100 Trying response may be sent for BYE (see new RFC on non-INVITE transaction fixes). But in general, non-INVITE requests should be responded to with a final answer as soon as possible. This is because for UDP the UAC will keep retransmitting the request, even when it receives a provisional response (although with a longer interval)

For INVITE, the idea is that interaction with a human is involved, and humans are slow. A provisional response for INVITE stops retransmissions (and enables other pre-session request-responses such as UPDATE, 100rel with PRACK, etc). All other requests require a quick (<500ms) final response

So a user receiving a BYE does not get to say "hmm, let me think about it...". 

Regards,

Jeroen
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Thomas Shanthi-LST016 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:11 AM
  Subject: [nist-sip] Provisional response for BYE Request


  Hello,
        I'd like to clarify if a SIP Provisional response (1xx) may be sent in response to a BYE Request. As per RFC 3261, Sections 17.1.2.2 and sections 17.2.2 both client and server non-Invite transactions can handle a Provisional Response to a non-Invite request. 
  So I'm assuming this applies to the BYE Request and is supported by the NIST SIP stack. Is this correct? 

  All descriptions of 1xx responses are tied with the INVITE message and hence the question. 

  thanks,
  Shanthi 




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  nist-sip mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nist-sip

_______________________________________________
nist-sip mailing list
[email protected]
http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nist-sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.