Re: unanswered subsequent server transactions are not cleared from the transaction table after bye
"M. Rangnathan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.voip.nist-sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It is not behavior by design. It could be behavior by bug :-) Build a small stand alone example to illustrate the behavior (such as examples/simplecallsetup i.e. a modification thereof) and I can have a look. Ranga Hagai Sela (TA) wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following scenario – > > 1. A dialog is established between endpoints A (any UA) and B (my > nist-sip based UA). > > 2. A sends a hold request to b, and then immediately it sends bye. > > 3. B doesn’t handle the hold reinvite, but sends 200 OK on the bye > request. > > The result of this sequence is that the hold-invite server transaction > is left hanging in B’s transaction table. Is this behavior by design? > > Hagai. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >nist-sip mailing list >[email protected] >http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nist-sip > > -- M. Ranganathan Advanced Networking Technologies Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8920, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. tel:301 975 3664 , fax:301 590 0932 http://w3.antd.nist.gov/ Advanced Networking Technologies For the People!