Re: ACK sent too soon?

"Jeroen van Bemmel" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.voip.nist-sip
Message-ID <004a01c6d11d$45841a60$0601a8c0@BEMBUSTER>
Becky,

Your problem is that the 180 response is missing a to-tag. The 200 has one, 
so the caller UAC sees this as 2 distinct dialogs.

The JAIN 1.1 TCK had a bug in Dialog testing that produced exactly the same 
behavior. Basically you're trying to invoke createACK on the dialog that 
only received 180, and that one is still in EARLY state

Regards,

Jeroen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "M. Ranganathan" <[email protected]>
To: "Becky McElroy" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [nist-sip] ACK sent too soon?


> Not immediately obvious why this is happening. May I request you to cvs
> update and try to reproduce this bug on the current source. Please send
> me a debug log so I can investigate (if you can reproduce the problem
> with debugging enabled). A small stand-alone example to illustrate the
> issue would be terrific.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ranga
>
>
> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 09:34 -0400, Becky McElroy wrote:
>> Hi -
>>
>> There seems to be an interesting behavior with the SIP stack where if
>> the application
>> sends an ACK too quickly (upon getting back 200-OK after sending
>> INVITE), it
>> seems the client side dialog state hasn't been updated yet from EARLY to
>> CONFIRMED
>> as a result of the 200-OK, so the ACK sending attempt gets this error:
>>
>>     javax.sip.SipException: Bad dialog state Early Dialog
>>
>> The application code that executes upon reception of the 200-OK looks
>> like this:
>>
>>             Thread.sleep(100);
>>             Request ack = dialog.createRequest(Request.ACK);
>>             parent.addAuthorizations(callId.getCallId(), ack);
>>             dialog.sendAck(ack);
>>
>> For the scenario where the error happens, the trace is below - if the
>> sleep timer is changed from 100 to 1000 the error didn't happen.
>>
>> Any hints appreciated!
>> Thanks,
>> Becky
>>
>> PS. The nist stack (latest 1.2) used here was a snapshot from early June
>> timeframe.
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> <!-- Use the Trace Viewer in src/tools/tracesviewer to view this trace
>> Here are the stack configuration properties
>> javax.sip.IP_ADDRESS= 172.16.40.38
>> javax.sip.STACK_NAME= testAgent
>> javax.sip.ROUTER_PATH= null
>> javax.sip.OUTBOUND_PROXY= null
>> javax.sip.RETRANSMISSION_FILTER= null
>> -->
>> <description
>> logDescription="testAgent"
>> name="172.16.40.38" />
>>
>> <message
>> from="172.16.40.38:5060"
>> to="172.16.100.164:5060"
>> time="1157425082618"
>> isSender="true"
>> transactionId="z9hg4bke489cea93bff84317a12ef358d20c0dd"
>> callId="[email protected]"
>> <mailto:[email protected]%22>;
>> firstLine="INVITE sip:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> SIP/2.0"
>> debugLine="42"
>>  >
>> <![CDATA[INVITE sip:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> SIP/2.0
>> Call-ID: [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>> From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=1968514642
>> <mailto:[email protected]%3E;tag=1968514642>
>> To: <sip:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 172.16.40.38:5060;branch=z9hG4bKe489cea93bff84317a12ef358d20c0dd
>> Max-Forwards: 70
>> Contact: <sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=udp;lr
>> <mailto:[email protected]:5060;transport=udp;lr>>
>> Route: <sip:172.16.100.164:5060;transport=tcp;lr>
>> Content-Length: 0
>>
>> ]]>
>> </message>
>>
>> <message
>> from="172.16.100.164:1314"
>> to="172.16.40.38:5060"
>> time="1157425082712"
>> isSender="false"
>> statusMessage="before processing"
>> transactionId="z9hg4bke489cea93bff84317a12ef358d20c0dd"
>> firstLine="SIP/2.0 100 Trying"
>> callId="[email protected]"
>> <mailto:[email protected]%22>;
>> debugLine="83"
>>  >
>> <![CDATA[SIP/2.0 100 Trying
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 172.16.40.38:5060;branch=z9hG4bKe489cea93bff84317a12ef358d20c0dd
>> From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=1968514642
>> <mailto:[email protected]%3E;tag=1968514642>
>> To: <sip:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Call-ID: [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>> Contact: <sip:172.16.100.164;transport=udp>
>> Content-Length: 0
>>
>> ]]>
>> </message>
>>
>> <message
>> from="172.16.100.164:1314"
>> to="172.16.40.38:5060"
>> time="1157425082727"
>> isSender="false"
>> statusMessage="before processing"
>> transactionId="z9hg4bke489cea93bff84317a12ef358d20c0dd"
>> firstLine="SIP/2.0 180 Ringing"
>> callId="[email protected]"
>> <mailto:[email protected]%22>;
>> debugLine="125"
>>  >
>> <![CDATA[SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 172.16.40.38:5060;branch=z9hG4bKe489cea93bff84317a12ef358d20c0dd
>> From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=1968514642
>> <mailto:[email protected]%3E;tag=1968514642>
>> To: <sip:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Call-ID: [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>> Contact: <sip:172.16.100.164;transport=udp>
>> Content-Length: 0
>>
>> ]]>
>> </message>
>>
>> <message
>> from="172.16.100.164:1314"
>> to="172.16.40.38:5060"
>> time="1157425083087"
>> isSender="false"
>> statusMessage="before processing"
>> transactionId="z9hg4bke489cea93bff84317a12ef358d20c0dd"
>> firstLine="SIP/2.0 200 Ok"
>> callId="[email protected]"
>> <mailto:[email protected]%22>;
>> debugLine="190"
>>  >
>> <![CDATA[SIP/2.0 200 Ok
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 172.16.40.38:5060;branch=z9hG4bKe489cea93bff84317a12ef358d20c0dd
>> From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=1968514642
>> <mailto:[email protected]%3E;tag=1968514642>
>> To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=ds-3106-2cb5
>> <mailto:[email protected]%3E;tag=ds-3106-2cb5>
>> Call-ID: [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>> Contact: <sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=udp
>> <mailto:[email protected]:5060;transport=udp>>
>> Allow: INVITE,ACK,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,INFO,OPTIONS
>> Supported:
>> User-Agent: Nuance/-b058-win2k
>> Content-Length: 201
>>
>> ]]>
>> </message>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nist-sip mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nist-sip
>
> _______________________________________________
> nist-sip mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nist-sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.