Re: NAT & rfc 3327

Ryan,

Sounds about right. It appears that in your setup OpenSER is 
proxy/load-balancer only for REGISTER requests?

Regards,
Jeroen

Ryan Mitchell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're using OpenSER for proxy/load-balance in front of our JAIN based
> b2bua/registrar, and use OpenSER's PATH module to insert Path: headers
> when needed for NAT'd clients per rfc 3327.
>
> The plan is to store PathHeaders with contacts in the registrar, then
> for new requests that resolve to that contact I'll take the
> PathHeaders and convert them to RouteHeaders.  At this point the
> stack should send the request to the first hop in the first
> RouteHeader (which in our case should be the OpenSER proxy).
>
> Does that sound correct?  If there is anyone else that has explicitly
> implemented rfc 3327 support is this the way to do it?
>
> thanks!