Re: Re: Multiple sip applications with Jain-sip
"M. (Neo-Ranga) Ranganathan" <[email protected]> Fri, 4 May 2007 07:07:27 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.voip.nist-sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Listening point maps to ip-address, port Provider maps to ip-address,port,transport. It is the "event source". Stack is a "management artifact", (i.e. in jsip 1.2 it is not connected to ipaddress and port). Hence you can "start" or "stop" a stack etc. There is one SipListener per stack. If you wanted two "applications", then I assume the intent is to manage each independently of the other. Therefore one would assume to stacks are needed. Ranga. note: I cc-ing users@jain-sip because the discussion originated there. On 5/4/07, niepin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I wonder if this is multi-apps or multiple sessions. If one streaming > application could be treated as one streaming session, then one SipStack and > SipListener is enough. Each streaming instance is bound with a UDPHandler > behind, which deals with the media socket. > > Multiple sip stack is applied only when the underlying signaling channel > changes, e.g. transport (TCP+UDP), or port number. Is it so? > > BR > > niepin > > _______________________________________________ > nist-sip mailing list > [email protected] > http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nist-sip > -- M. Ranganathan "There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works." -- Alan Perlis