Re: usrloc deletes other server's data (suspected bug)

Henning Westerholt via sr-users <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.voip.ser
Message-ID <DB5PR07MB945351F4DD4B18976A979D70BF73A@DB5PR07MB9453.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Hello,

it looks that the location_attrs functionality does not take in account the server_id, at least in db_mode 1.

You could create an issue about it, or investigate the code to create a pull-request if possible.

Cheers,

Henning

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Browne via sr-users <[email protected]>
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2025 17:53
> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <[email protected]>
> Cc: James Browne <[email protected]>
> Subject: [SR-Users] usrloc deletes other server's data (suspected bug)
> 
> Hi
> 
> I've two servers sharing the same postgres database, using kamailio's
> "server_id" value. One has server_id=184 and the other has
> server_id=186.
> 
> I've set these parameters.
> modparam("usrloc", "server_id_filter", 1)
> modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1)
> modparam("usrloc", "db_ops_ruid", 1) # I've tested this with both 0 and 1.
> 
> When a user REGISTERs, I see data being written to two tables, as
> normal, from server 184.
> update location set expires='2025-06-11 16:31:58' ... server_id=184
> ...' where ruid='uloc-b8-684999a9-31e-1'
> delete from location_attrs where ruid='uloc-b8-684999a9-31e-1'
> insert into location_attrs (username,ruid,...) values
> (...'uloc-b8-684999a9-31e-1' ...
> 
> The problem comes when I start server 186.
> select contact,... etc. ..., username from location where server_id=186
> select username,ruid,aname,atype,avalue from location_attrs
> delete from location_attrs where ruid='uloc-b8-684999a9-31e-1'
> 
> 
> What I see is that server 186 always deletes the data from the
> location_attrs table that belongs to server 184, which I don't think
> it should do.
> According to the usrloc documentation, server_id_filter must be set
> (as I've done) or "Otherwise one instance of proxy cleans records made
> by another proxy and that breaks its cache."
> 
> Therefore this looks like a usrloc bug to me. Am I doing something wrong?
> I'm testing with a commit that was made yesterday (kamailio 6.1.0-dev1).
> 
> James
> __________________________________________________________
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- sr-
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
> sender!
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.